blob: 0a94d162d85bbcc888c4fa0652595f99011576bb (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
|
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css" />
<link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
<title>Filtering the web</title>
</head>
<body>
<header>
<h1>Bloggings</h1>
<a href="/index.php">Back</a>
</header>
<main>
<article>
<h2>Filtering the web</h2>
<h3>2026-06-20</h3>
<h4>A browser that says no</h4>
<p>
To me the problem with the smolweb is that there's isn't a browser
that applies these rules. Dillo comes close, even though it needs a
makeover.
</p>
<p>
Dillo also has an rdrview plugin, but you have to manually write
rdrview: in front of the url in the url bar of every page to see the
results.
</p>
<p>
A better solution would be a smolweb plugin that filters the entire
html page rejecting anything that doesn't
<a href="https://smolweb.org/validator/">validate</a> or pass to
rdrview . Degrees of acceptance could be set in settings.
</p>
<p>
A dedicated browser wouldn't require searching for smolweb / smallweb
/ indieweb blogs, sites, or articles. (There seems to be no such thing
as a smolweb search engine, although points for wiby, marginalia, kagi
and mojeek).
</p>
<p>
Just point the browser to any web site and if it borks, display the
"errors" or ignore it with a
<a
href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Status/418"
>
418 I'm a teapot error</a
>: after all it's the web site author's responsibility to provide
clean, readable web sites.
</p>
<p>
Imagine a world where this plugin would be as ubiquitous as
ublock-origin, it could even change web site development.
</p>
</article>
</main>
<footer>
<p>§</p>
</footer>
</body>
</html>
|
