1 files changed, 62 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/articles/2026/Filtering-the-web.html b/articles/2026/Filtering-the-web.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0a94d16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/articles/2026/Filtering-the-web.html
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+<!doctype html>
+<html lang="en">
+  <head>
+    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
+    <link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css" />
+    <link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
+    <title>Filtering the web</title>
+  </head>
+  <body>
+    <header>
+      <h1>Bloggings</h1>
+      <a href="/index.php">Back</a>
+    </header>
+    <main>
+      <article>
+        <h2>Filtering the web</h2>
+        <h3>2026-06-20</h3>
+        <h4>A browser that says no</h4>
+        <p>
+          To me the problem with the smolweb is that there's isn't a browser
+          that applies these rules. Dillo comes close, even though it needs a
+          makeover.
+        </p>
+        <p>
+          Dillo also has an rdrview plugin, but you have to manually write
+          rdrview: in front of the url in the url bar of every page to see the
+          results.
+        </p>
+        <p>
+          A better solution would be a smolweb plugin that filters the entire
+          html page rejecting anything that doesn't
+          <a href="https://smolweb.org/validator/">validate</a> or pass to
+          rdrview . Degrees of acceptance could be set in settings.
+        </p>
+        <p>
+          A dedicated browser wouldn't require searching for smolweb / smallweb
+          / indieweb blogs, sites, or articles. (There seems to be no such thing
+          as a smolweb search engine, although points for wiby, marginalia, kagi
+          and mojeek).
+        </p>
+        <p>
+          Just point the browser to any web site and if it borks, display the
+          "errors" or ignore it with a
+          <a
+            href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Status/418"
+          >
+            418 I'm a teapot error</a
+          >: after all it's the web site author's responsibility to provide
+          clean, readable web sites.
+        </p>
+        <p>
+          Imagine a world where this plugin would be as ubiquitous as
+          ublock-origin, it could even change web site development.
+        </p>
+      </article>
+    </main>
+    <footer>
+      <p>§</p>
+    </footer>
+  </body>
+</html>